A new bill from Elizabeth Warren and Ro Khanna seeks to ban the trade of water futures. Let's go one step further.

From conservation to importing water from the Pacific, Democrats say they have all the answers to historic drought. The one thing no one wants to talk about: stopping the sprawl.

Taxpayers are on the hook for heat-related crop losses in parched states like Arizona. That needs to change.

How the so-called virtual water trade affects the Colorado River

Agriculture is the big draw on the Colorado River. But as the crisis deepens, everyone’s doing what they can.

Torrential rains, flooding, and mudslides in California are a preview of an alarming future.

The German river, subjected to a massive nineteenth-century engineering project that facilitated coal transport, now needs engineers to intervene again due to global warming.

Water cuts and dam removals are now necessary steps to keep the consequences of the climate crisis at bay. But the only long-term answer is to cut emissions.

Some of the senators blocking climate policy represent states struggling with drought and wildfire.

The restrictions are essential to keep the states from running dry, but vulnerable communities have already suffered from water scarcity for years.

Colorado River drought and water supply issues could soon affect 12 percent of Americans.

The basis of all human life is now officially on the market. Call it the No Future futures index.

Canyon de Chelly, part of Navajo Nation lands in Arizona, has been suffering from worsening droughts.

Scott Slater wants to pump billions of gallons to LA and other drought-hit cities—and make $2.4 billion in the process.

And want the government to spend billions to solve it